| Task | Starting material | Human check |
|---|---|---|
| Interview synthesis | Invented interview extracts | Preserve evidence and disagreement |
| Requirements draft | Validated observations | Separate need from proposed solution |
| Project summary | Meeting notes | Verify decisions, owners and dates |
What could a practical exercise look like?
Start with invented interview notes containing conflicting views. Produce a requirements draft that cites its evidence and lists unresolved questions. A colleague checks whether an assumption has been turned into a decision.
What working document could the team keep?
An evidence-linked requirements draft and a list of open decisions.
What needs particular care?
Interview material can be confidential. Do not infer user consensus from a few extracts or automatically turn generated requirements into approved backlog items.
What should you prepare before the session?
Bring one representative task and explain who performs it, which sources are available and who reviews the result. Agree the tools and documents authorised for the exercise before sharing anything. The final programme, trainer, dates and quotation are defined during scoping.
