| Task | Starting material | Human check |
|---|---|---|
| Clause comparison | Invented contract extracts | Locate every cited difference |
| Policy draft | Approved organisational rules | Check scope and responsibilities |
| Research organisation | Primary materials | Verify currency and jurisdiction |
What could a practical exercise look like?
Compare two invented clauses, then draft a review note with exact source passages and unanswered questions. The reviewer must distinguish textual differences from legal conclusions that need independent analysis.
What working document could the team keep?
A source-linked review note and a draft policy structure.
What needs particular care?
Professional secrecy, privilege and confidentiality need a suitable approved environment. The exercise does not certify compliance or replace a professional legal opinion.
What should you prepare before the session?
Bring one representative task and explain who performs it, which sources are available and who reviews the result. Agree the tools and documents authorised for the exercise before sharing anything. The final programme, trainer, dates and quotation are defined during scoping.
